A reviewable patch, never direct access.

Codissimo is an experimental coding assistant. It can analyze uploaded projects, propose patches and test supported patches in an isolated server workspace. It cannot directly modify files on your computer.

Invite-only preview. Public registration and automatic approval are off. Never upload secrets, credentials, regulated data or a production-only repository.

1. Authenticate and consent

Experimental access token I understand this is experimental and may fail or produce incorrect results.I will not upload secrets, keys, production credentials or regulated data.I made a backup of the project.I understand the disclosed provider processes selected bounded context.I accept the 24-hour project, 7-day proposal and 30-day metadata retention limits.

Provider disclosure

Provider: ReverseML bounded local proposal engine Model: codissimo-proposal-0.2-dev Processing: local server; no remote provider call Selected files: shown after upload Context: bounded UTF-8 source files only Project retention: up to 24 hours Proposal retention: 7 days Training: disabled Research reuse: disabled

If a remote provider is introduced later, its name, model and bounded file selection must be shown again before every task.

2. Upload a bounded project

ZIP only: 25 MiB compressed, 250 MiB expanded, 10,000 files, 1 MiB per file. Links, binaries, nested archives, traversal, encrypted archives, .git objects and credential files are blocked or excluded.

Project ZIP

Or public GitHub repository (read-only; no private credentials)

Public GitHub URL

3. Proposal

Task

Before submission: local-server provider, bounded selected source files, no remote processing, no training, proposal retained seven days. Review generated code yourself.

4. Optional isolated sandbox

Runs only after explicit approval. Network is disabled; no dependency installation; no production mounts or secrets; workspace is disposable.

Allowlisted profile

The website never applies this patch to your computer.

5. Data and feedback

Was the proposal useful?